Once more into the breach dear friends, once more…: Global Warming Stopped!?; In a related story…, ; Meet the new crew…; Another congressional round of testimony?

Deep Ocean Heat Content 0-2000 Meters

Deep Ocean Heat Content (1955-59 vs. 2008-2012)

Once more into the breach dear friends, once more…

Global Warming Stopped!? Again…

The Economist reported an article this month called ‘A Sensitive Matter‘.

Not unlike the Wall Street Journal last year the focus is on the ‘leveling’ of the temperature record, on ‘too short’ a time scale. Short time-scales incorrectly represent the state of the climate. The Economist article is not as off as other interpretations of the scientific understanding such as at Fox News, but the inference and the headlines is more misleading and may infer and convey bias. Fox news tends to focus on the ‘it’s not a problem’ scenario, without ever asking the questions that would reveal what the word ‘problem’ means in this context. Fox does ask people questions, but they focus the question on people such as Marc Morano, rather than those that know the science better. This tends to solicit the answers they may already be seeking rather than the truth of the matter.

The facts are that short term drops, and rises, in surface temperature readings, over a limited number of years, can be attributed to natural cycles related to ocean heat content overturn combined with atmospheric cycles/patterns. These shorter term natural cycles can drive global temperature up and down temporarily. But this is not the same as the long-term trend based on the total energy added to the system by increased greenhouse gases. Interesting to note however that these ocean atmosphere cycles are also increasingly operating under the influence of human changes; and are thus are thus operating under greater potential influence of these human induced changes; and the resulting change in total climate forcing.

So, is the big news really that global warming stopped…

and does this mean that the climate sensitivity is much lower than models predict? If it were true it would be truly great news. Just one little problem, it’s not true. The ‘Earth’s climate system’ is still warming, and the climate sensitivity is still estimated to be in the vicinity of 3º C for a doubling of CO2 (possibly a little lower/higher).

Where’s the Heat?

Well…, it’s not under the couch. It’s under the surface of the ocean. In the deep ocean actually. Think of it this way. Pretend you live in a mansion and 90% of the mansion is getting warmer, but some people are in the part of the mansion that is not getting warmer because someone closed the heat vents to the rooms they are in, or left some windows open. And the people that live in those rooms are claiming that the rest of the mansion is not warming because the rooms they are in are not warming. It’s worse than a specious argument because there is no evidence that it might be plausible; it’s simply wrong.

It’s a classic logical fallacy based on misunderstanding the reality of the temperature in the other rooms of the mansion, which make up 90% of their world, so to speak. Sort of like saying it’s winter where I live in the northern hemisphere, so it must be winter everywhere… forgetting, or ignoring, entirely that half the planet is the southern hemisphere where, for example, Australia exists…, where it happens to actually be ‘summer’ when the northern hemisphere is in winter.

Simply Put…

Heat energy that might have ended up in the atmosphere is being stored in the deeper ocean. Don’t worry though, that energy will rise again… Well, actually that might be something to be concerned about since that energy will further influence storm and precipitation events.

What’s Really Happening…

Keep in mind that significant uncertainties still exist as to measurement coverage at the TOA (Top Of the Atmosphere) regarding the accuracy of the total radiation imbalance. Recent changes in tropical zonal winds and increases in the transport of heat energy to the deep ocean are now being tracked with more instrumentation than before. The accumulated knowledge contributed form Navies all around the world for ocean heat content now allow a more systematic examination of ocean heat content since 1955.

The deep ocean heat energy storage has been building steadily but changes in the natural cycles/variation, such as heat transport mechanisms, including ocean/atmosphere cycles and evaporative cooling (wind which desalinates water, enabling salt to attach within the interstices of water molecules increasing density and carrying heat energy deeper in the ocean), which removes heat that would have been available for atmospheric warming.  Other natural variations, such as changes in the MOC, and PDO also aid in transporting heat into the deeper ocean. If these mechanisms had not transported the heat into the deep water the atmosphere would have shown increased warming. The conclusion is that the earth is still warming, it’s just not showing up in the surface temperature record at this time.

So why the misleading headlines?

One must consider that those reporting of climate science are also not experts in climate science. That translates to some confusion about how to approach the subject and not really knowing which information is more relevant than less relevant information. This in turn is easily exploited by by those that are biased toward the ‘it’s all a hoax’ idea. In the end, the public is confused by the mixed messages but none of the mixed messages actually change the reality that Earth is warming and that the warming is human-influenced.


In a related story…,

yet another politician Republican Joe Barton has invoked biblical references to support the red herring argument that humankind might not be responsible for current warming.

    Meet the new crew…

    When the new Congress convenes tomorrow, climate change deniers will ascend to the chairmanships of several important House committees.

    1. “Rep. James Sensenbrenner (R-WI) vice chairman of the House Committee on Science and Technology under incoming chairman Ralph Hall (R-TX).  Sensenbrenner, who denies the evidence demonstrating that human-induced greenhouse gas emissions are driving climate change, has already announced his intention to obstruct the Environmental Protection Agency’s regulation of emissions.”
    2. “Rep. Paul Broun (R-GA) will become chairman of the Committee’s Investigations and Oversight Subcommittee. In 2009 Broun called global warming “one of the greatest hoaxes perpetrated out of the scientific community,” to thunderous applause from his colleagues.  Broun likely will seek to use Congress’s authority to subpoena and investigate climate scientists.”
    3. “The Economy and Environment Subcommittee will be chaired by Rep. John Shimkus (R-IL), who famously believes that climate change can do the world no harm because God promised to keep Earth safe for humanity after Noah’s flood. As Shimkus puts it, “I believe that’s the infallible word of God, and that’s the way it’s going to be for His creation.””
    4. “The new Energy and Power Subcommittee will be chaired by Rep. Ed Whitfield (R-KY), a longtime antagonist of the EPA and a staunch advocate for Kentucky’s coal industry who does not regard global warming to be an important issue.  Whitfield’s subcommittee will oversee energy issues and the Clean Air Act.”

      Source: Center for Inquiry

      Another congressional round of testimony:

      Leave it to the Republicans in charge of the committee to call on witnesses that will ensure the confusion continues.

      Subcommittee on Environment Hearing – Policy Relevant Climate Issues in Context

      Subcommittee on Environment | 2318 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515 | Apr 25, 2013 10:00am


      Dr. Judith Curry, Professor, School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology
      Truth in Testimony

      No written or video testimony found on sub-committee site?

      Located this PDF on Judith Curry’s web site:


      Judith also posted a transcript of her spoken testimony here:



      Dr. William Chameides, Dean and Professor, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University
      Truth in Testimony

      Dr. Bjørn Lomborg, President, Copenhagen Consensus Center
      Truth in Testimony

      No written or video testimony found?


      Note on Lomborgs comments: He uses a sophist type of false logic that sounds like circular reasoning, but equates to no reasoning. He also uses non sequitur arguemnts. Essentially he says trying to do something has not helped so we should stop trying to reduce CO2. Non sequitur arguments are apparently his forte:

      See ‘The Copenhagen Distraction